Better late than never, New York Times

Better late than never, though I am not sure Sheikh Hasina Wazed would have won a free vote either (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/opinion/editorials/bangladesh-election-sheikh-hasina.html?fbclid=IwAR0WHcijPV-mdyyWil5ai0iY9MkvBgjqWQWm6llz408Ttjxk-9u5OmzXY_U) . But the NYT and it’s ilk share the blame too: time and again and again they have given space to the junta’s craven apologists (like K Anis Ahmed, a pro-regime publisher who, along with his American wife, owns the junta’s flagship college with the ironic name of University of Liberal Arts, who wrote a big pro-dictatorship piece just a week before the elections) to advocate for the dictatorship. Before that, it was the the kids of two major newspaper editors (kids who live in the freedom that America provides) who waxed eloquent about the ‘glory of the Awami League’ on those pages. The liberal-progressive crowd in the salons of New York, DC, and London has to share the responsibility for normalizing these tyrants…as do many of the civil society types in Bangladesh. That cup of tea at Gonobhobon (the official residence of the dictator) or getting that minister at your daughter’s wedding or son’s new company inauguration is worth the last sliver of conscience for these Bangladeshi pseudo-savants.

Even as it condemns the farcical vote, however, the New York Times, whitewashes the legacy of the Awami League when it merely says Sheikh Hasina Wazed’s father ‘was killed’ in 1975. The truth is that the father usurped the Westminister constitution of 1973, instituted a one-party Stalinist state in 1975 via the infamous “Fourth Amendment” that abolished all parties (except his own), shut down all newspapers (except the four owned by his family members), and mandated that the judiciary, civil servants, and military officers take oaths of personal loyalty to him. To make sure his diktats were followed, he created the “Rakhi Bahini” paramilitary force that was, by law, put outside the ambit of judicial review for its activities. His own sons (Sheikh Hasina’s brothers) were well known for using the Rakhi Bahini to abduct women and loot businesses. Against this backdrop of utter tyranny, was the daddy’s rule ended amidst a coup which paved the way for the restoration of multiparty democracy in 1977.

Pearls before swines

There is a saying in many South Asian languages that the wicked rarely listen to reason, let alone morality…kind of like the pearls before swines adage. Bangladesh’s one-party, one-family regime is no different. Messages, diplomatic notes, exhortations, and cautionary advice to these people is unlikely to do much. Short of Magnitsky type sanctions on key regime figures like the ministers, police chiefs, election commissioners, party leaders, university chancellors, the junta’s key business allies in the apparel sector, and their respective families, little is going to change. The Bengali mind is not yet ready for shame emanating from the sage advice emanating from friends (let alone foes) if that advice is not backed up with consequences. In the Bengali ruling class, we are not dealing with the Marquis of Queensberrry-rules sort of people; sad but true.

Only in Bong-land!

Awami League apologists like Gowher Rizvi and his ilk regularly regale us about how Bangladesh is the epitome of Westminster parliamentary democracy…..but shy away from the obvious truth that only in Bangladesh among such ‘democracies’ is the ruling party and the ‘official’ Opposition (Jatiya Party) elected as electoral coalition partners. It is the statecraft equivalent of having your cake and eating it too. Puts a whole new meaning to the ancient phrase “Her (Bong) Majesty’s Loyal Opposition”.

The torture prince of Virginia

One of the greater ironies of the Bangladeshi junta is that the ‘crown prince’ Sajib Wazed ‘Joy’ who is the son of the Bangladeshi dictator Sheikh Hasina and a cabinet level adviser on information technology to his mommy, lives in Virginia under the freedoms afforded by America’s Constitution while directing the surveillance, capture, and torture of dissenters in his his mommy’s “people’s republic”. One of his other pastimes is regularly bashing the ‘West’ and ‘America’ for not falling in line with his regime’s dictatorial efforts to crush any dissent. Wasn’t it for such situations that from the times of the Framers to today, there exists the Alien Torts Statutes?

Second line enforcers of the Bangladeshi regime

The Bangladeshi regime’s grassroots terror squad “BCL” gets far less attention than its counterparts like the “Basij” in Iran, the “War Veterans” in Zimbabwe, or the “ANCYL” of South Africa do, for reasons ranging from its 1950s beginning as a student organization to the fact that most foreign journalists covering Bangladesh are too lazy to delve deeper.  But the BCL is nothing if not the street enforcer of the Awami League regime: when even the police can find no legal avenue to visit state terror and the compliant judiciary has the occasional rare judge who sides with defendants in state sponsored prosecution, it is left up to the Awami goon squad BCL to get things taken care of ‘unofficially’.  It was localized armed units of the BCL who were used in the recently concluded ‘election’ to beat up almost every Opposition candidate, destroy their cars, and threaten their families so that only the Awami League nominees could ‘campaign’. Rare is it, if ever, for a criminal associated with BCL to be apprehended, let alone prosecuted for the perpetration of any and all crimes. Of course, at the country’ premier seat of learning—the University of Dhaka—the BCL runs the roost determining who gets admitted, who gets to stay in the dorms, and which faculty members get tenure https://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2018/01/27/du-authorities-using-bcl-like-pakistan-rulers-used-nsf-cpb-chief-selim . Not surprisingly, most news outlets in Bangladesh are too afraid of having their own facilities and employees getting ‘visits’ from BCL and hence rarely report on the vigilante organization. It remains a mystery—except for the lack of interest shown by lazy Western journalists—as to why the BCL has not been branded a terror organization by the major democracies of the West.

Selling the dream of a Stalinist state

Despite the oft-repeated ludicrous claims of its mandarins that the ruling Awami League party is the most liberal political outfit https://bdnews24.com/politics/2018/12/24/awami-league-briefs-diplomats-on-election-issues, the truth is uglier and compelling. In its first run at the helm of Bangladesh in the 1972-1973 period, the party abolished a Westminster multi-party democracy and installed a Stalinist one-party state under an ideology called “BKSAL” with all civil servants, judges, and military officers required to take oath to the President for Life…which just happened to be the father of the current “prime minister” Sheikh Hasina. Some of the Awami League leaders who were part of the one-party putsch—like Hasina’s key adviser H T Imam—continue to serve at the highest levels of government in this Awami League regime. Aware that the world doesn’t quite like, in the aftermath of the Cold War, outright one party states of the Soviet variety, the current regime has adopted a de facto rather than de jure approach to its well-known desire for a one-party system. The approach involves harsh suppression of any real dissent at home, stage managed ‘elections’ like the one of December 30, 2018, draconian censorship policies, and grassroots level non-government vigilante forces like the BCL terror group to ensure localized compliance. A big part of selling this as a Third World utopia falls to smooth talking spokesmen duos who can charm low level functionaries in the foreign ministries of Western capitals and junior editors on Fleet Street with the panache these functionaries and scribes are not used to enjoying. Among these apologists are couples like Gowher Rizvi, once a professor of politics in Virginia and his Italian wife Agnese Barolo; K Anis Ahmed,  the owner of the regime’s flagship private university “ULAB” and his American wife and former Newsweek columnist Juditha Ohlmacher, and, of course, Hasina’s son Sajib Wazed Joy and his lawyer wife Christine Overmire, both living in the Washington DC area off the ‘consulting fees’ from the taxpayers of Bangladesh. Credit where it is due: The Dhaka regime has perfected the art of finding the right people to do its advocacy while the utterly sidelined and slightly awkward foreign ministers (they have two of them) are rarely at the front and center of such frays of schmoozing bedazzled, mid-level, foreign dignitaries.

Rape as a weapon of compliance Part 2

The Awami League and its in-house vigilante group BCL have long used the threat and perpetration of sexual assault to keep dissenters in Bangladesh in line. In a conservative society where the issue continues to be taboo, the sheer terror of being victim of rape and being shamed for being that victim is a prospect no woman wants to imagine. In 2017, at the height of the student-led movement for establishing a merit-based civil service, not surprisingly the BCL threatened female students with dire consequences; also not surprisingly no BCL leader was ever punished for such terrorism. https://www.daily-sun.com/post/322863/2018/07/17/%E2%80%98BCL-men%E2%80%99-threat-to-rape-female-quota-reformist-at-Jahangirnagar-University

Rape as a weapon of compliance Part 1

Unfortunately, these stories are a legion not only in this recently concluded ‘general election’, but throughout the reign of the Awami League since 2009. Or even before. In fact, the late Sheikh Kamal, the brother of the current dictator Sheikh Hasina, was well known for abducting co-eds from Dhaka University (in true style of the sons of Saddam Hussein) during the 1972-1975 rule of the Awami League under Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the father of Sheikh Kamal and Sheikh Hasina. Sexual assault, often a taboo subject anywhere but especially in conservative societies of South Asia, has a special place in the DNA of the ruling Awami League.https://www.thedailystar.net/backpage/news/mother-four-gang-raped-al-men-1681405

Bangladesh’s Schutzstaffel

Since the beginning of its reign in 2009, the Awami League party (which just won the ‘elections’ with 96 % of the seats lol) has used its in-house vigilante squad, acronymed “BCL”, to visit terror on its opponents when even it’s pet police and official paramilitary units demurred such acts on the basis of being outside the broadest remit of professionalism. In the just concluded joke of national elections–like in previous local elections–the BCL has used its cadres to enforce compliance with regime dogma, broken bones of dissenters, killed, raped, and maimed to sow fear amongst ordinary Bangladeshis. In the dorm of public universities and in their faculty halls, the BCL runs the show, with any student or faculty not towing the regime line thrown out if he/she are lucky, ‘disappeared’ if not. In more ways than one, the BCL is the Bangladeshi regime’s answer to the ‘War Veterans’ of Mugabe’s Zimbabwe and the ‘Basij’ of the mullahs of Iran (with whom the Bangladeshi regime is very close). #bdpolls2018

Just like in Syrian elections

So, as expected, the Bangladeshi junta got about 90 % of the vote in the just concluded ‘parliamentary’ elections which its security chiefs claimed were the ‘most free’ in history. That is usually the percentage that dictators often get in their ‘elections’…the other 10 % of the vote a reflection of possibly a few very brave souls or clerical error on part of tabulating machines or the last glimmer of conscience in cowed election officials.